![]() ![]() Growing startups and big enterprises can't afford downtime. Updates and bug fixes in monolithic apps demand taking all apps offline. ![]() Different repositories and development environments per service are allowed. In general, one service team's changes won't break the entire app. When you implement significant changes in your service, you don't demand changes in other services. Possibility to use different tech stacks and test environments in each separate service. Below are all pros and cons regarding microservices architecture: Like every architecture, this approach has its pros and cons, especially when compared with typical, most popular, startup-loved monolithic architecture. Pros and cons of microservices in comparison with a monolithic architecture. But we need to be conscious that this approach creates additional problems with, e.g., maintenance and debugging. It also allows an organization to evolve its technology stack. In general, microservices architecture improves scalability and performance, enabling the rapid, frequent, and reliable delivery of large, complex applications. We can build each functionality/feature completely separately with a dedicated and separated team. Loosely coupled, independently deployable collection of services. ![]() The primary assumption of microservices architecture is a modular structure. What is microservices architecture about? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |